Humanity cannot grow forever, this much we know
yet this pointless endeavor, we continue to crow
Growth, production, profit, eternally
Onwards we march infernally
A futile progress to appease sentiment
and hold off the inevitably coming resentment
There is nothing left to learn
only for the past do I yearn
the future holds no hope
at it blindly, do we grope
false confidence will abound
till the trumpet of the apocalypse sounds
Work, work, work, work your days away
to appease the idol of shame
work, work, work, work until you drop
don’t ever relax, don’t ever stop.
Work, work, work, till your being is vacuous
till you are empty of life and hopeless
Work, work, work, forever delay gratification
till you hate yourself too much to ever seek satiation
Work, work, work, so you can take the moral higher ground
and justify your wealth, even while others freeze on the cold ground.
Work, work, work, even though it just creates a burden for others
their lives, enjoyments and dreams, it smothers.
Work, work, work, dig yourself an early grave
over produce, over consume, forever crave:
A happiness never met, and never shared
never provided for others, as you simply didn’t care.
Work, work, work, blow your own trumpet of selfishness
while accusing others of lazy, idle devilishness.
Work, work, work, to create an illusion of self worth
when you know in truth there is only a dirth
Work to fill others pockets, and to fill the world with more life’s
more lambs to the slaughter, struggling and full of strife.
Work, work, work, for the ethic of our civilization
till it’s shrivelled up in need of revitalization
Work, work, work: the constant distraction
from friendliness and mutual attraction
Work, work, work, work in your dying days
till your purpose becomes a shoddy haze
Work, work, work, till the machines take your job
when you are finally free to act like a slob
hooked up to the teat of your state overlords
telling you what to think and feel, when you are bored.
An experience once rich in texture and detail
in hope and possibilities, and ways to prevail
has grown duller somehow, over the course of time.
In blocking out the bad, the dirt and the grime,
much good also has been lost in what I can see
in what I am willing to feel and to be.
My filtered experience has left not a rich, fine-grained sand
but a tendency to grasp only at what is bland.
What is predictable and easy, and expected all along
a tuneless, noteless, white noise of a song.
The world of today is different from the world of 100 years ago. Geographically, politically, culturally, scientifically, and in many other ways too. Different does not always mean better, nor does it always mean worse. It just means different. Obviously, there is a natural anthropocentric bias for our current society as being “best”, for it is “our” society. But this bias is being confuted with some generic idea of steady progress of society in all ways and in all manners from year to year. Technological progress aids this illusion, among other things.
One difference that is not better, I would say, is the standards of reason and evidence used in discussions among people. We have much more come to rely on emotional appeals, not just as an adjunct to a good reason, but as the reason itself for holding a view or belief. We have become more likely to try and ostracize someone who holds views we do not like or find offensive, and much more likely to appeal to some authority or expert, and class this as in itself “evidence”. As if the correct answer to a riddle or problem, is simply a matter of following directions to the respected authoritative source of evidence, and then accepting this view blindly with no attempt to apply your own critical faculties of reason to it, or questioning or debating with this viewpoint.
Reasons for holding views have become much more fickle and changeable, and we see intellectual fads that come and go all the time. Yet people still hold and defend views with an avid passion. They just defend them more often with poor arguments, appeals to authority, attempts at ridicule, attacks on the people who hold the opposing view, rather than on their arguments.
All of this shows us that rationality is not something guaranteed to us by some safe and secure logical procedure, or by some infallible source of evidence. The error of logical positivism was to imagine it had supplied both of these. It felt science, through verification theory of meaning was an infallible source of evidence, and it felt that logical procedures of understanding could all be reduced to safe and secure, (but null and void) tautologies or conventional agreements.
On both fronts it was wrong, on both fronts it failed. Yet despite this theoretical failure, we seem to be largely living in a world now that takes these views as successful for practical purposes. Conventions are accepted because they are convenient, and this itself is a tautology. The snake eats its own tail, and happily continues so far, till it runs out of its own body to feed off.
Instead of this sad state of affairs we need to appreciate again that reason and rationality is not guaranteed to us, it is not a faculty that simply needs to be allowed freedom to express itself. It is a complex set of values and practices maintained only by a community of people with an active interest in preserving those values for future generations. We are the source of reason, not some isolatable part of our mind, or isolatable set of procedures to follow. We either continue the discussion in a reasonable way, or we revert to appeals to authority, when such appeals can only ever end in the use of forced consent when people refuse to agree.
Woke up the other day surprised to see that the UK had decided to leave the EU. Take out London and most of the rest of England voted to leave at around 57-43. Scotland voted to remain at around 60-40. As did London. Another surprise for me initially was the polls showing that young voters were more likely to vote in. I remember seeing a BBC pro EU propaganda piece early in the campaign that quite in reverse to this, boldly stated that younger people would be more likely to vote out. The point of that particular piece, of course clearly was not about facts, as it is reverse of the facts as it turned out, but it was a subtle piece of attempted delegitimization of people’s motives who wanted to leave, suggesting they were young, inexperienced, naive etc.
This subtle manipulation, uniformly pro EU across all the major TV channels, pervaded the whole campaign, and successfully swayed large numbers of younger voters for whom what the TV says is more real than what they see outside their window. It was a tiring few weeks having to spot and repel all this attempted manipulation of your basic motivational drives to act. And all the attempted shaming of leave voters on social media such as Facebook. Basically it was a case of trying to demonize and polarise people into an untenable position from which they would then no longer be motivated to act. This process is continuing afterwards by shocked people who cannot believe what the TV told them was so, turned out not to be so.
It has been a learning experience for me, and I think for many people, we were more prepared for these tactics after similar tactics were used to scared Scottish people out of leaving the UK. This was still fresh in people’s minds, and I think was a decisive factor. All in all, not an awful lot changes, economic arrangements will still be made with the EU, the difference is we will be free to decide our own economic arrangements with countries outside the EU.
Through all the bad arguments, through all the ad hominem character attacks, through all the attempted demonisation, the attempted shaming, the appeals to authority insteady of reason, people in large numbers ignored it all, or fought against it all, and stuck with the conviction they felt inside. It is an interesting time now that lies ahead.
Lost in Paranoia
the Mind Destroyer
What is this person thinking
are they trying to hurt me?
Implications forever linking
never safe to simply be.
But is it just my illusion
or am I subject to malicious confusion?
Hard to tell the true from the lie
hard to find a friend I can trust
no matter how much I think and try
the enemies seem always to forwardly thrust
so I set up my defensive measures
I wait on guard forever unsure
it brings me discomfort and displeasures
and I know it has no cure.
But I must remain true to my own conviction
to my own ideas and mental restrictions
I have no choice but to choose myself
even though it may be bad for my health
in the long term there is no other choice
except to kid yourself you have no voice
to stay quiet and submissive
of paranoia suspicious and dismissive.
But this is not a choice at all
just an inertial state of free fall.
Scarcity or the threat thereof, will always pervade human life
This basic reality is where many well-meaning people lose touch with said reality
They want no one to suffer, sure, they want poverty gone, sure
But how exactly do they expect natural selection to take effect on such an insulated population?
Bad mutations build up over time as a natural tendency, in the population as a whole,
natural selection is a process for weeding this out and keeping those bad mutations out.
By only letting a select few breed, while others lose out in the natural struggle..
Yes it is ruthless, it is not nice in any way, sure, but it remains reality.
We must come to terms with this, more importantly, women, naturally more compassionate, must learn to accept this reality now we are in a equal society where there influence on our political and cultural developments are much greater.
This is coming from someone who may well lose out by this system. I am not successful or wealthy as of yet. I have little to no sway over anyone else in this world. But still I can accept this is the reality of how life must go on. We cannot insulate ourselves from it for ever, or even for very long.
It needs a new place accepted within our politics, away from this childish game of snap between the political left and right.
My view here would cross over with the libertarian approach. But I would not cross over with them on many other things. I do not see their better appreciation of this economic reality as coinciding with some greater rationale in all areas of moral and political debate. In fact, in many other areas their slavish adherence to their rationale gets in the way of a better appreciation of reality. For instance the libertarian view on things such as world conflicts, and religious and cultural influence in society is very naive and impractical.
We need a free market on sexual breeding of the better genetic material. By competition etc, threats of scarcity, that weed out the best from the rest, in how they react to these situations. But we don’t need a similar free market on many other things. A pure free market on ideas would soon descend into chaos. Some/many ideas are simply accepted as easier due to traditions, and easier as they are naturally passed on by one generation to the next. You cannot treat each newborn as an isolated atomic tabula rasa, free to be moulded by ideas in a purely rational way. It simply doesn’t work. All you end up with is disenfranchised, disempowered individuals, dependent on passively being manipulated by media association games that play with their emotional responses and short cut any intelligent thought. And hopelessly dependent also on science and technology and experts to tell them what to think and how to act. This is not a culture, but a society void of culture, ruled purely by instrumental relationships with people being used as means to others ends, and not respected in their own right.